Commentary on "Prop 19 and Federalism"

I think that "Prop 19 and Federalism" poses some very interesting questions. I was always raised hearing about how horrible marijuana is, and that it is only a gateway drug for worse, but this commentary points out that maybe, if used responsibly, marijuana could be what helps to save California’s dying economy. Tim wisely includes that California’s legislators estimate that tax revenues from marijuana could reach $1.4 billion per year, as well as saving millions from those who are incarcerated and patrolled. This could be the one thing that could solve California's financial crisis, and if made a national law, could save the U.S. economy. I think Tim is correct in saying that if Proposition 19 is passed, other states will soon follow. He does a good job of explaining the uncertainties of federal-state relations with an issue this controversial.

I agree that legalizing marijuana has many important benefits, but I also think that the potential negative effects cannot be ignored. For example, it is very likely that people will not abide by the limitations on marijuana growth and possession. Also, it is a safety hazard, and there is a reason why people call it a gateway drug. Tim makes a vital argument for legalizing marijuana in “Prop 19 and Federalism,” but I think that the issue is much more complex than just the fact that it will help our economy.